5. How can a rigorous set of SLAs or benefits related to technology, resources, change management, and other aspects of the whole system be related to patient outcome?
Much discipline is required by the organization to provide adequate sponsorship from the clinical, staff, administrative and executive stakeholders and users. The clinical and statistical outcomes should be to the extent possible setup as quantifiable measurements and made as tangible as possible. Careful planning will have to be undertaken by not just technologist but by end users who will take ownership of the end solutions and new clinical / business processes. There must be strong leadership and their must be buy-in by all to effectuate the changes needed to make the appropriate use of technology succeed. The greatest benefits of technology are not in the first implementation (which is most often very painful) it is in the ability to appropriately share, decimate and reuse information. One of the main reasons health informatics implementations are so far behind this that it is such a painful and complex process to start this implementation process. There are so few organizations who do it 'right' or stick with it to get the integration benefits.
There have to be new measurements - Service Level Agreement's (SLA), charters or contracts put in place between user departments, health administrators, vendors and the government to get long term results which are based patient, clinical and commercial outcomes. These are not just dollar and cents contracts, these are long term performance agreements which are based on subjective and objective measurements, outcomes and results.